The result might have been manipulated - here's a comparison with no compression or manipulation, just two different font sizes for upper case and lower case:
The tittle maintains its original shape (which is very slightly oval), but the tops of the i's and r do look flatter. The r-i ligature is cleaner in the logo, with the tittle appearing to be eliminated and the letterspacing changed. So I agree that the final image was graphically edited or manipulated, but I'm not sure how.
3 Sep 2012 — 8:08pm
I suspect that this is Bookman Bold that's been squashed and heavily modified.
http://www.myfonts.com/fonts/itc/bookman/std-bold/
3 Sep 2012 — 8:16pm
Yes it's Bookman, but neither squashed nor modified.
It's Bookman, with Bookman Swash for the capital M and Z.
- Herb VB
3 Sep 2012 — 9:59pm
Herb, thanks for pointing out the swash.
I still say it's squashed -- look at the height of the lower-case letters in the logo, and compare with Bookman bold...
It's squashed AND swashed ;)
3 Sep 2012 — 11:27pm
The result might have been manipulated - here's a comparison with no compression or manipulation, just two different font sizes for upper case and lower case:
The tittle maintains its original shape (which is very slightly oval), but the tops of the i's and r do look flatter. The r-i ligature is cleaner in the logo, with the tittle appearing to be eliminated and the letterspacing changed. So I agree that the final image was graphically edited or manipulated, but I'm not sure how.
3 Sep 2012 — 11:17pm
Nice work ;)
4 Sep 2012 — 12:55am
Depending on how old the logo is, it could be Bookmania.