Possibly work on a rule from the 'left-foot' of the k to the i? Maybe scrap the swash on the bottom left of the i.
This is purely a remark on how it could look 'kool' as I have no idea what it could be for, the genre, its characteristics, whether its selling something etc.
On first viewing I like it! Good sense of movement, but not boy-racer speed...
Unfortunately, I think it might lose some legibility at smaller sizes - the 'k' and 't' are a bit too similar. Maybe you could give 't' a medium ascender height?
13 Dec 2010 — 4:13pm
What is it for?
13 Dec 2010 — 4:20pm
It was created for fun. It could be used for something in the future.
18 Dec 2010 — 12:02am
Like what?
Providing context about your wordmark will yield a better critique.
19 Dec 2010 — 4:44pm
I think it's a clever type concept suggesting speed or motion. It just flows.
maybe the t should be a bit shorter??
there is something about the r..
20 Dec 2010 — 5:47am
Possibly work on a rule from the 'left-foot' of the k to the i? Maybe scrap the swash on the bottom left of the i.
This is purely a remark on how it could look 'kool' as I have no idea what it could be for, the genre, its characteristics, whether its selling something etc.
20 Dec 2010 — 12:19pm
Logos 'just for fun' aren't really something that can be critiqued other than asking: did you have fun making it?
20 Dec 2010 — 9:06pm
On first viewing I like it! Good sense of movement, but not boy-racer speed...
Unfortunately, I think it might lose some legibility at smaller sizes - the 'k' and 't' are a bit too similar. Maybe you could give 't' a medium ascender height?
23 Dec 2010 — 7:14am
@aliminum
of course you can give feedback on a fun logo
for instance about it's aesthetics and legibility
this way he can improve his techniques