i can read it, but not too clearly. the H could be a double T... and the RK is a little hard to read. overall, i think it looks 'off' because it slants further and further down, till it about falls off my screen. it starts out straight, and then just degrades.
6 Aug 2004 — 8:34am
i can read it, but not too clearly. the H could be a double T...
and the RK is a little hard to read.
overall, i think it looks 'off' because it slants further and further down, till it about falls off my screen. it starts out straight, and then just degrades.
6 Aug 2004 — 9:05am
I read, "Pit ttFortz". My confusion is caused by the following:
1 The "c" curling up, rather than down makes it seem like a swashy arm to the "tt".
2 Because of the LC/UC type, the "H" reads as "tt", or because of its positioning it reads as an UC "H" starting another word.
3 The "r-k" reads as "rtz", especially as the positioning relates to the dropping "tt" in Pitch.
I imagine the rightbound degradation of the letters that Loren referred to can be dealt with if there are any graphics to be associated with the type.
PS: Thanks for the assistance on my So Cal Waves logo.
6 Aug 2004 — 10:07am
Thanks for the input!
Loren: Yeah, I guess I'll try aligning the PITCH on one baseline, and the FORK on the other. That H really is in limbo. I'll simplify it too.
Scott: No problem, I hope I have been helpful to you. Your input is certainly helpful. The RTZ I will have to rework. I'll post again soon.
Thanks guys.
Andrew
6 Aug 2004 — 12:18pm
Here is a rework based on your suggestions.

Andrew
6 Aug 2004 — 1:36pm
It looks a little like PitchFerk, and Im somewhat distracted by the Capital H . I love the k though.
6 Aug 2004 — 1:56pm
Yer right Hugh. I'm in between stages of development. I'll post a rework later.
Andrew
6 Aug 2004 — 1:57pm
delete