New to Typophile? Accounts are free, and easy to set up.
A work in progress. I think something's a little buggy…
< a > = Hamburgerfonts
< em > = Hamburgerfonts
< strong > = Hamburgerfonts
< cite > = Hamburgerfonts
< code > = Hamburgerfonts
< ul > =
< ol > =
< li > =
< dl > =
< dt > =
< dd > =
10 Jun 2009 — 5:41am
Thanks for this. I tried to use < i > yesterday, and discovered it got swallowed up. Only after posting did I realize that I should have tried < em >.
10 Jun 2009 — 5:49pm
@christopher
ul and dl are "container" HTML elements. That means they're designed to describe syntactically and encase other elements.
UL means unordered list and holds LI - list items. It doesn't hold text on it's own.
DL - same thing. Means definition list and holds dt and dd elements.
The comments parser that Typophile uses is just guessing at what to with the text within a UL or DL tag but yet outside of a LI or DT or DD tag.
Regards,
rich
18 Jun 2009 — 6:25pm
So we have:
<dl><dt><dd>The usage is something like:
<dl><dt>Term</dt><dd>Definition</dd><dt></dl>—Joel