New to Typophile? Accounts are free, and easy to set up.
Create an account
Typophile RSS | More Feeds
These are a handful of the options I've been staring at. Any thoughts on color options, containing shapes, etc? Thanks.
(The first file is what I'm working on. The second is the primary logo, from which the other options are derived.)
I like from the 2nd file...... the second one
I like it as it is
good fonts
I agree, bottom one from the 2nd set. First set reminds me of Hershey's.
Second set is better. But none of them says (without explicit words) "we're in creative business". Are you?
The first says "dog pedigree" to me, the second explicitly says "tough" but rounded shapes don't support that. It's still better than the first one.
But as mentioned: I wouldn't select any for design agency/freelance/etc. ___________ Robert Koritnik
I am "in the creative business," but I don't think a logo needs to smack you in the face with that fact.
i think because it is tough design... u stay tough with it:)
I don’t think a logo needs to smack you in the face with that fact
But it should at least not give you the impression of an industrial company making cogs/tins/etc... I think. ___________ Robert Koritnik
i agree with litera. it made me think of tractors, a la john deere.
20 Jan 2009 — 8:51pm
(The first file is what I'm working on. The second is the primary logo, from which the other options are derived.)
20 Jan 2009 — 11:59pm
I like from the 2nd file...... the second one
I like it as it is
good fonts
21 Jan 2009 — 12:10am
I agree, bottom one from the 2nd set. First set reminds me of Hershey's.
21 Jan 2009 — 12:47am
Second set is better. But none of them says (without explicit words) "we're in creative business". Are you?
The first says "dog pedigree" to me, the second explicitly says "tough" but rounded shapes don't support that. It's still better than the first one.
But as mentioned: I wouldn't select any for design agency/freelance/etc.
___________
Robert Koritnik
21 Jan 2009 — 10:21am
I am "in the creative business," but I don't think a logo needs to smack you in the face with that fact.
22 Jan 2009 — 12:12am
i think because it is tough design... u stay tough with it:)
22 Jan 2009 — 1:57am
I don’t think a logo needs to smack you in the face with that fact
But it should at least not give you the impression of an industrial company making cogs/tins/etc... I think.
___________
Robert Koritnik
22 Jan 2009 — 7:49pm
i agree with litera. it made me think of tractors, a la john deere.