New to Typophile? Accounts are free, and easy to set up.
Create an account
Typophile RSS | More Feeds
Wait your critics. ET
Hey, nice! "Serious fun" is how I'd describe it. And great modulation on the tight joins. UC: "C" might be wide; I'd raise the bar of the "E", and maybe make it slightly thinner; the "F" isn't working; killer "K"!; not sure about the "Q"; great form on the "S", but maybe a bit wide; "X" seems too strong; amazing Pilcrow; the "N"-tilde is too cool. Nums etc.: I'd make the square brackets concave; the "1" and "4" seem a bit strong; "6", "8" and "9" need modulation. lc: the "e" needs modulation; great "fi"; make the eszet sharp on the inside. Other: great Yen; amazing "@"! but make the belly-button bigger; great Section. Eduardo, you really have a knack for inventive shapes. Don't lose it! hhp
I really like this! Anyone else thing the "f" might be too thin? It doesn't seem to have the same "oomph" as the rest of the face.
You can see the changes in ouline. Thanks, et
Eduardo Esta fuente me encanta...ya te lo he dicho y seriamente Creo que la e necesita un poco mas de ojo interno. La Q quiza la haria descender un poco de la linea de base. Es genial!
Eduardo, I'm sorry I didn't see this post in June... I really like this! "Serious fun", indeed... My one comment is about the tails of Q and Y... They seem to need some more separation from the rest of the letter. By the way, I like the way you show the changes you made in the second PDF.
Great work! Hope you do other weights too,
This is great fun, really quirky. It almost bounces because of your lc_d and lc_b. I think the uc_M and uc_W are too wide. Love the uc_K. Is the uc_P too quirky? Maybe the uc_S is a bit too wide as well.