New to Typophile? Accounts are free, and easy to set up.
I'm perpetually visually curious, and I've been playing around with the logo for the church I work at. I'm curious what people think – whether I've improved (or dis-improved) the logo.
Mine's on top, set in an Eisner+Flake Giovanni small caps (with serifs tweaked a bit).
| Attachment | Size |
|---|---|
| CCG logo.pdf | 281.52 KB |
24 Jan 2008 — 9:13am
Well, from a no-more-faux-small-caps perspective, yours is certainly better. I want the shield/crest to be bigger, as it is in the original. I just prefer the balance, particularly in light of the added weight. Also, the 'W' could stand to snuggle up to the 'N' just a bit. Perhaps you could to a little custom work on the join where the serifs will overlap?
Overall, I think it's a subtle improvement, unless the client doesn't like the heavier feel of the type. I admit I prefer the weight of the bottom version, other issues aside. But that's a matter of personal taste.
25 Jan 2008 — 2:16pm
Here's another stab at it, with a vrai caps created from the faux.
Which is preferred?