Seems to be a bit under-designed for a design company logo. I know one shouldn't overdo a logo for a design business, but one shouldn't under-do it either.
To me it would be new and fresh ... if this was 1971.
As a design firm, I think you should either have a logo that is really, really good/creative/innovative/informative.
Or don't have a logo. (ie deliberate understatement)
--
of all the fishes in the sea
the little mermaid is one for me
16 Aug 2007 — 9:37am
Snap judgements:
Feels European. Modern. Could be a fashion boutique.
16 Aug 2007 — 9:58am
European, Formula 1, racing.
the type feels too skinny compared to the 1.
16 Aug 2007 — 11:26am
modern. font weight is off. number 1 competes with light font.
16 Aug 2007 — 11:40am
I see fashion as well, especially when it's surrounded by so much whitespace. The '1' does feel heavy.
There's nothing wrong with it, but there's nothing that makes me say "wow" either.
- Lex
16 Aug 2007 — 3:29pm
Seems to be a bit under-designed for a design company logo. I know one shouldn't overdo a logo for a design business, but one shouldn't under-do it either.
17 Aug 2007 — 4:10am
To me it would be new and fresh ... if this was 1971.
As a design firm, I think you should either have a logo that is really, really good/creative/innovative/informative.
Or don't have a logo. (ie deliberate understatement)
--
of all the fishes in the sea
the little mermaid is one for me
17 Aug 2007 — 5:05pm
First impression: I wasn't sure if it's a number "1" or a letter "l" or what else. It just looked so out of place.