(x) A typeface so nondescript I'm having trouble identifying - Gotham {Iran Narges}

DesignGuyMemphis's picture

It's not Neutraface. Not Engravers Gothic. Not Blair. Not Gill Sans.

Any ideas?

AttachmentSize
AthenaeumPress.jpg27.33 KB
inarges's picture

Looks like it could be Gotham Medium?

DesignGuyMemphis's picture

Right as rain.

This site rocks! Thanks for your guidance.

inarges's picture

Ha! Nice :-)

Miss Tiffany's picture

I wouldn't say Gotham is nondescript.

Stephen Coles's picture

It is! That's its beauty.

Miss Tiffany's picture

Hmm. I guess I use the word nondescript to describe fonts that are boring. If I alter my usage, then yes, Gotham doesn't call a lot of attention to itself and yet maintains a certain amount authoriy. So, ok ok, yes Gotham is nondescript.

Spencer Cross's picture

Yum. I love Gotham. I can't believe anybody would call it boring.

--
SPENCER CROSS
[professional] http://tokyofarm.com
[personal] http://fivethousand.net
[communal] http://kernspiracy.com
[cultural] http://blogging.la

DesignGuyMemphis's picture

No offense to Gotham or its makers. I love the face as well. In this limited context, I simply didn't recognize it. By "nondescript" I meant that it lacked any distinguishing features that could be used in an online search of most font sources. You're right, Stephen. The beauty of Gotham is in its understated simplicty.

Thanks again, all.

Syndicate content Syndicate content