large font families?

thierry blancpain
2.Feb.2006 11.11am
thierry blancpain's picture

hi

i did search, but couldnt find any thread about this subject. im looking for a list of font families with at least a few serif and sans cuts - the more, the better.

do you know of such a list already existing, and if not, why not start it here..

i know a few (fago, meta, stone, thesis, etc..) but i think there are more out there.

thank you!



.
2.Feb.2006 11.37am
.'s picture

Freight by Joshua Darden comes to the top of my mind:
http://joshuadarden.com/
&
http://www.philsfonts.com/sresults.html?key=4&fcs=freight052005


David Hubner
2.Feb.2006 12.23pm
David Hubner's picture

Marvellous ’John Baskerville’ and ’John Sans’, by František Štorm
Dederon Serif’ and ’Dederon Sans’, by Tomáš Brousil

Dav

* Yea, I DO love Czech Type :)


suntory
2.Feb.2006 12.44pm
suntory's picture

>> I DO love Czech Type
Peter Biľak’s
Fedra
http://www.typotheque.com/site/fonts.php?id=6


suntory
2.Feb.2006 12.47pm
suntory's picture

and Eureka


Nick Shinn
2.Feb.2006 12.49pm
Nick Shinn's picture

Panoptica is the champ, with seven different typeface styles.

Fontesque has Display and Text versions of the serif styles, five weights of sans, and four styles of ornament.

Scala
Quadraat
Fedra and Eureka (Typotheque)
Clearface
Legacy

***

Gill Sans/Perpetua
Avant Garde/Lubalin Graph
Optima/Palatino

Many of Gerard Unger’s designs have a commonality of proportion, so his sans faces would work well with serif, and this is probably true of quite a few other designers’ work.


pattyfab
2.Feb.2006 3.30pm
pattyfab's picture

Seria/Seria Sans


terminaldesign
2.Feb.2006 6.14pm
terminaldesign's picture

Other than creating an artificial rush of “suggestions” the question I have is: why?


mwebert
2.Feb.2006 7.24pm
mwebert's picture

Let’s see.

FF Absara...
Psy/Ops used to sell Eidetic Modern & Eidetic Serif...
Neutra, Gotham, Paperback, Farnham, Mercury...

Lots more...

—Michael.

———————————————————————————
// love what you do or do something else. //
Michael Ebert — graphic designer, jazz saxophonist, horror movie devotee
http://homepage.mac.com/mwebert
mwebert@mac.com
———————


thierry blancpain
3.Feb.2006 2.09am
thierry blancpain's picture

thanks for all the suggestions!

>> Other than creating an artificial rush of “suggestions” the question I have is: why?

im doing an internship right now and for a clients new CD a co-worker was compiling a list of large font families, because for bigger clients, it is very handy (and probably easier to convince the client to buy it) if you have one family that includes sans and serif .


pattyfab
3.Feb.2006 6.28am
pattyfab's picture

grrrr. double post. Anyone else having problems with the site lately?


thierry blancpain
3.Feb.2006 7.08am
thierry blancpain's picture

double posts? cant see any doubleposts in this thread.


pattyfab
3.Feb.2006 7.53am
pattyfab's picture

It was my double post - I edited it. I am finding this site grindingly slow lately and keep getting timed out while I try to post.


thierry blancpain
3.Feb.2006 11.21am
thierry blancpain's picture

anymore?


Nick Shinn
3.Feb.2006 11.46am
Nick Shinn's picture

...why?

Convenience.

However, that is only part of the reason that sans + serif families exist, and not the main reason.

They exist for the expediency of the type designer/foundry, not because having a sans + serif family is necessarily a good idea for the end user.

I extended the Fontesque family to include sans, not because I envisioned typographers mixing the two in layouts, but because the original serif face had proven to be a popular type design, and brand, so a product extension seemed like a good bet.

Also, once the type designer has one version of the face, it’s a big time saver to use its outlines and metrics to construct the other.

Of course, typographers can use a mega-family sans + serif in the same layouts to good effect, but speaking from under my art director hat, I think it’s much more interesting to see someone artfully match a pair of typefaces that no-one else has previously teamed up.

Using sans + serif from the same mega-family is in danger of being rather obvious, and may even be just plain lazy.

James Montalbano, among others, has a better idea — matched typefaces (Alfon and Giacomo) designed to work together, but with sufficient stylistic contrast to be piquant.

The main thing is to give them the same vertical metrics, and similar horizontal proportions.