Typorexia: where's the meat?

Palatine
15.Jan.2006 1.25pm
Palatine's picture

I have noticed that there is a quiet war being waged by designers, typographers and enthusiasts alike, against the thin, wispy text faces that characterize most of today’s digital type.

The weapons in our arsenal? Robust, dark faces such as Dolly, Quadraat, Bembo Book, Absara. Dark, meaty faces all.

So what are your favourites for text? What of all these light, anemic faces that litter the typescape? Opinions? Comments?



Stephen Coles
15.Jan.2006 3.13pm
Stephen Coles's picture

The one that made me see the (dark) light: Renard in Smeijers’ book, Counterpunch.


Nick Shinn
15.Jan.2006 5.55pm
Nick Shinn's picture

The problem isn’t new, but a condition of hi-res, digital typography, which uses single master fonts optimized for mid-size text (hence weak for smaller text), and production processes that have little or no “gain”.
Some of the first faces to address it were Adobe Garamond, Charter, Scala, and yes, Quadraat.
I think you will find that’s it’s an issue addressed by a large percentage of digital text face designs, it’s certainly something I consider for all my serifed designs.

One solution is to provide different “weights” for different circumstances, variables such as size, stock, printing technique, etc.
The most sophisticated has been developed by Tobias Frere-Jones. Originally named “tuning”, now it’s “Grades”.


Stefan H
16.Jan.2006 11.30pm
Stefan H's picture

I made a similar thing with Delicato. Regular, Medium and Bold are using almost the same width and amount of space and can be chosen for desired “thickness” in print without any changes in the text flow. This feature will probably (hopefully) be more common for text faces in the future?!


kris
17.Jan.2006 2.06pm
kris's picture

My own technical term is “grunt”. We are designing a book of poems by an Ethopian refugee at the moment, whose writing is as subtle as a charging rhino. Maple Medium is proving to be sufficiently “grunty”, thank you very much!

We like meat on our bones.


hrant
17.Jan.2006 2.18pm
hrant's picture

Darkness rules.
And although it’s true that the anemia of the 70s has now been overcome, to me we still have a way to go. Smeijers has probably been the most explicit and persistent advocate of darkishness.

> The most sophisticated has been developed by Tobias Frere-Jones.

FontBureau, and probably specifically David Berlow, deserve that credit. On the other hand they in turn publicly credit the old Linotype news faces, some of which were in fact repeatedly re-made for slightly different gain amounts (as well as widths) but to me not in a sufficiently unified way to deny FB due credit.

See also this:
http://typophile.com/node/15204

But it needs to be pointed out here that grades are not intended to make text appear darker of its own - more like just compensate for technical issues, in fact to maintain the weight, and generally the conventional/mainstream weight.

Stefan, I love uniwidth fonts (one of the appeals of Compatil to me) but beyond a certain weight (including the bold) it causes the black forms to become uncharacteristically narrow in order to maintain uniwidth (and in the light end uncharacteristically wide).

hhp