Creative Squeeze Logo

squeeze's picture

After going through the grinder of naming my business Creative Squeeze I am finding that developing one's own identity is extremely difficult. Rather than focusing on the objectives of the design, I am constantly dealing with emotions and opinions. I have hit the sketchbook and funneled with friends to arrive at these two design directions. Typophiles

hrant's picture

That's a greta name, and you can do a lot with it!
Just don't get too literal, but don't be afraid of being a little bit cute.


squeeze's picture

I hear you doubleHp. My original hours of sketching were turning up illustrations of squeezed toothpaste, paint tubes, condiments (ketchup/mustard), and most of all lots and lots of citrus fruit and juice drops. It made for some nice visuals, but was too literal. I sense that the bulging/squeezing letters (3rd design from the top) concern you as being too literal

capthaddock's picture

I didn't see the Windows logo. I thought it looked more like a billowing flag (but very abstractly so).


hrant's picture

To give you an idea of how_much/what_kind of "literality" I think might be good: like half a lemon is obviously too much, but a drop shape might be great. Like you're getting the last drop of benefit out of projects. Maybe just a drop shape between "creative" and "squeeze", with possibly a progressive (but subtle) narrowing of the letters the closer they are to the middle.

The one with the wavy bulging/squeezing letters: I think the problem with it is simply that it's too cheesy, too much squeeze ecstasy or something. Plus it looks like a suspension bridge or an audio company.

As for the Windows thing:
- I don't think it's very pronounced. I didn't see it.
- As much as some people (like me) can't stand the beast, most layman actually like MS. But since you're a design outfit (an area of Mac-worship) the MS connotation would indeed be a negative.
- Those "E"s don't really say much anyway. Or maybe they say tickle, but not squeeze.


squeeze's picture

Thank you for the words of wisdom. hhp, I agree with your analysis of the tickling "E's". I have spent some time this afternoon on some concepts that I think are saying a little more. I'm still not in love with the "E's" on the concept second from the bottom. If I was designing something wicked, using black and red instead of gray and orange, I think I'd be onto something

hrant's picture

Well, the geometric face would lend itself more to lateral manipulation, so in that way it's versatile. That said, I don't like any of the three logos that use it... :-(

The Gill would certainly be more resistant to the ravages of time, so to speak, and it's not bland. Of the bottom two I'd say the first is a bit too... sexual or something, but I think the drop-as-tail on the "Q" holds promise, if you can make it more noticeable, and more integrated into the letterform. You could also try making the inside counter of the "Q" drop-shaped.


Dan Weaver's picture

What I feel you need to do is create a feel not a logo and have a tagline that explains your business goals.KISS, remember most of the people who are looking at your logo/site aren't artists, but need an artist. Let them get beyond your logo and to what you are trying to sell them, this is just a thought, Dan

leer's picture

The last logo with the drop becoming the tail on the Q is clever. I do agree with previous comments though that it is somewhat lost in the design.

close's picture

hi scott,

i agree with Leah, the last logo is really quite clever and also subtle, which i think is good for a design firm. great name btw. maybe you should play with different typefaces to integrate the drop in a more obvious way. for example, imagine using a grotesque face while keepig the O a perfect circle. also try if you could make that work in one colour only. and don't forget the U next time ;-)


sham's picture

Maybe if the dri/op was disconnected from the Q it would work in one color, be slightly less subtle and bring a smile to the viewer when they discover it and think themselves smart for "getting it."

Of course any mustardy yellow gets my approval.

Miguel Hernandez's picture

Try to make a variation on your windows double e, but with lowercases. You can make a ink drop with letters, but in a more caligraphic stroke ends, the other yellow drops that you make looks like a liquid soap for a set of dishes.

Post images in a lil big scale, if you keep yellow.

Good work,


rs_donsata's picture

You could draw the type just like if it was printed in a transparent paper and you squeezed it like a cloth, only one turn, do you get it??


bongo's picture

I like the understated approach of the "Q drop" version. I think it would read better if you separate the drop slightly from the letterform instead of having the colors touch.

beejay's picture

Scott, Aloha!

I really like:

* the stacked idea
* the drop idea from the Q
* the color scheme

I don't really like:

* the calling attention to the double Es
* the stubby Q
* squeezing or stretching (but you could use
a condensed face stacked with a normal face)

I was wondering what font is the unicase font. It reminds me a little bit
of Neon from Aldo Novarese.

maybe more playful or relaxed
choices for the type?

i dunno.

good stuff so far,


beejay's picture

Sorry, Neon by G. de Milano (Nebiolo)
which I don't think has been digitized.

If it has, i'd love to get it.


squeeze's picture

Thank you all for your thoughtful and inspiring feedback, thus far. I hope to receive more in the coming days, as I continue to work on my logo between paying projects.

I am on the drawing board applying some new approaches which will be revealed shortly, but for now I just wanted to let BJ and Jared know what font was originally used for the unicase concept. It is a less-than-sophisticated font called "New Hamburger" and yes, Jared, the "Q" is in its original form.

I'll be back

squeeze's picture

I'm back, finally. Between Kai, my 1 yr old, and progressing on some of those projects that pay the bills, I haven't had much time to focus on Creative Squeeze.

The following concepts explore the "Q-drop" that was initiated in my last round from the concept where I embarrassingly left out the "U" in SQUEEZE. So I won't be winning any spelling bee's, but hopefully one of these concepts will take me into a direction that is acceptable at all necessary levels.

I am personally leaning toward the Clarendon logo, as the "Q" has some fun personality while the logo in its entirety maintains corporate appeal

hrant's picture

I like the Clarendon too, maybe because it looks like a lot can be squeezed out of it! But the tail/drop in the second Cochin one is much better than the inside/outside tail in the native Clarendon "Q".


mica's picture

The yellow Q between the other brown letters seems a little small, especially on the second Cochin (who's droptail I like very much). The size of the Q is not so bad on the Clarendon version, but it still looks sorta short.

aluminum's picture

"where I embarrassingly left out the "U" in SQUEEZE"

You know, I went back to look at that and I
actually like it. It's certainly an interesting
way to make the name a tad more unique. Perhaps
it's needed (less someone pronounces it skeez)
but, maybe not.

I like the clarendon too, but prefer the original drop implementation (with a hollow 'o' shape).

squeeze's picture

Yes, Darrel, I wish I could've said that I had intentionally left the "U" out of SQUEEZE

hrant's picture

I don't see any tongues.

I like the middle one.

BTW, you're getting some scaling artifacts, most visible around the diagonals. Are you working from an 8-bit-color original?


aluminum's picture

Yep. The middle one.

Not so sure about the brown, but colors are highly subjective...

Ignacio's picture

Another subjective thought Scott, I am not sure about that uncoated brown for the logo either. I like the way it works with orange in text "pms 130 uncoated (deep dirt brown)" but for the logo I see it too much deep dirt brown (

hrant's picture

You guys just gave me an idea:
Every font should have an "optimal" color associated with it.


timd's picture

Have you thought of using photography or 3d modelling to produce the Q?

timd's picture

Have you thought of using photography or 3d modelling to produce the Q?

close's picture

i agree with everyone on the solution in the middle.

Clarendon is a great choice, but highly overused these days. for alternatives you might wanna try EF Volta (from Elsner + Flake),
Oxtail by Stefan Hattenbach (PsyOps) or the daring new Farao by Peter Bruhn/Fountain, currently exclusively available at Veer.
it's sort of 'grungy', but has a great 'E'.


Ignacio's picture

> You guys just gave me an idea:
Every font should have an "optimal" color associated with it.

Not necessarily, I think it also has to do with the theme.
That orange (almost a warm yellow) with the brown I don't see it for Creative Squeeze Studio, if we were dealing with another kind of business: coffe, wood, lawyers, maybe, and the brown, with the claredon and a long name is very present.

But yes, I think that sometimes some colors fits better than others on a particular type, sometimes for visual reasons (it is hard to use yellow with thin type) and sometimes for other reasons like the shapes of the type, in a general way I think I prefer a green flashy clarendon than a trajan.

I think it is the same with other things, the cars for example, if you could buy a Ferrari, would you chose a dark blue? I don't think so, even if you were an old minister your doubt would be red, maybe yellow, the dark blue for the Jaguar. The submarines are a special case, I like yellow for them.

squeeze's picture

hhp: I think you may be onto something

squeeze's picture


ideagent's picture

Nice. I personally love the Q-drop. Is it the highlight that is bothering you? What if it was round and slightly larger? This might help it at smaller sizes. I vote YES to the citrus and Spree colors. Your card looks edible!

I like the idea of the back, but there is something a little awkward about it. Perhaps it needs a "splat" of freshly squeezed juice instead? A juice glass? An orange seed?... I better quit now...

hawk's picture


most of the time - i find it hard to write or to say a word about logos. the main reason: lack of info.

i don't see the whole process. i don't see the thumbnails. most of the time - i just see the result (very important: not just with your sample).

you have great name. and the idea with Q is also great.

the only problem - the typeface. a logo is its own typeface, in my opinion. that is to say - the typeface (e.g. clarendon) is only a guide. if you want, of course, to set your logo - apart from its competition.

that is to say: to play with the proportion, weight, spacing..... re-interpret anew. that is a logotype.


David Hamuel


who said - an esay job? :-)

ideagent's picture


I'm not sure I agree with Fredrik's analyses. I believe the beauty of your solution lies in it's simplicity. I also don't really think a logo needs to be a customized font in all instances. I think your choices are completely appropriate.

I believe that you can tie any loose ends together by providing a tag such as you did: "Freshly squeezed every time." Or perhaps something in reference to "creative juices"?

squeeze's picture

Thank you all for your intelligent and expert advice throughout this process. The crew at Typophile has supplied us with an excellent tool to sharpen our eyes and work. As of last night I have commited my business to the Clarendon logo with the "Q-drop", leaving room only for minor alterations. Today, I will make any final adjustments and continue working on the Creative Squeeze stationary suite. Any last suggestions are welcome, but for now I'll address these last critiques:

Fredrik and David: Yes, David, over the last 3-4 weeks there has been a great deal of time spent with pen and paper exploring multiple directions. As far as type selection is concerned

aluminum's picture

I think it's great. As for the typeface, I agree, in theory, that it's always nice to use custom type as it just makes the logo mark that more unique, but, in this case, it is the '0' that's the mark and is what allows it to stand apart.

I much prefer the bottom colors...brown is such a tough color to pull off.

As for the back of the cards, will that be a die-cut? I like the idea, but I'm not sure if I like the exact same drop on both sides. It might be a bit more clever to use a different type of treatment on the back.

hrant's picture

I would:
- Tighten the "IVE" and loosen the "EEZE".
- Lower the "@" in the email address.
- Raise the curly braces around the phone area code.
- Work on the kerning in the phone number.
- Replace the period after "

ideagent's picture

I didn't realize it was a die cut. It makes much more sense to me now.

Be sure to print lots of overs on the card. Your printer is going to be pulling his hair out trying to register with your Q. I have an embossed card for my business, and let me tell you, it was no picnic trying to register it with a surrounding color.

The only critical thoughts on the card would be that the "EEZE" seems a bit tight. I might also bring the size of the fonts down for the name and address. Although that may not be a good idea considering the color.

Great work!

ideagent's picture

Haha. Hrant beat me to the EEZE!

beejay's picture

Scott, another typophile! For some reason I thought you
were based in Hawaii*. :-)

I really like the overall tone of this critique and your presentation
has been consistent and professional. Kudos!

The question of "custom" vs. "stock" typefaces for logos and
trademarks has come up a few times at typophile, and I always
root for the custom angle. I'd agree with David to maybe examine
the letters again.

some places that could be customized....dunno how they'd look.

* subst. unicase 'e' or 'r' or 'a' for UC ones.
* look at different forms of UC A.
* drop the tail on the UC R below the baseline
or maybe create a new tail.
* see how letters look without serifs or with semi-serifs.
* could the drop shape work as a counter someplace else.


I think you said upthread that your clients were suits...if so, I think
you can stick with Clarendon, the custom Q, and be comfortable.
If you were going after a different demographic, then Fredrik's point would be stronger.

Just my opinion.

> BTW, from what I know a copyright notice is technically
invalid without the name of the owner following the year.

I've never heard understanding is that
a simple copyright

hrant's picture

BJ, normally I would advise customization too, but in this case Scott seems to want to express some support for the integrity of Clarendon as a font. This is as interesting and commendable as it is subtle.

> I would omit the

capthaddock's picture

I just wanted to say that I really like this, Scott.

I would omit the

beejay's picture

(moved to other thread) Sorry.

Jared Benson's picture

Just a quick piece of feedback - I prefer the double "ee" in "Squeeze" highlighted, while Creative stands alone. Plucking out letters from both words is too symmetrical and dilutes the concept.

I would also add that I think the literal route is not the best avenue to explore- you are doing a good job of bringing in the "citrus" concept simply by your color selection.

Maybe I missed it, but did you manipulate the Q? It looks smaller than the other letters- how does it look with a proper descending tail?


Miss Tiffany's picture

The last one is so clever. Do more thumbnails and roughs. Have you tried to stack it? (Don't forget to add the "U" this time). Maybe stacked, there is some way to incorporate the drop (or drip) on a larger scale??

Syndicate content Syndicate content