Yes, I'd seen that before (although I recently misindentified it as NBC36 on Typographi.ca), probably in an issue of Visible Language, but I'm not sure. I have a photocopy of the article somewhere in my "type closet"... Those little dots are basically very crude traps. But apparently they worked well at a certain size, on 70s TV (blurrier than today's TV). Anyway, it's nice to have an on-line reference.
Anyway, I couldn't find ANYTHING about it on the net... If Hrant is right (Visible Language), that'd be the most precise information I've found so far.
Oops. Meant to post this to Typo-L, but it went to Hugo's mail...
Wow, never seen this before. Looks like they took a slightly condensed Helvetica and subjected it to some primitive form of ink/light trapping with the same trap shape used on any problem area, no matter the angle. Odd. Looks like they ran out of steam and forgot to finish the ampersand.
14 Mar 2003 — 6:20pm
Yes, I'd seen that before (although I recently misindentified it as NBC36 on Typographi.ca), probably in an issue of Visible Language, but I'm not sure. I have a photocopy of the article somewhere in my "type closet"... Those little dots are basically very crude traps. But apparently they worked well at a certain size, on 70s TV (blurrier than today's TV). Anyway, it's nice to have an on-line reference.
hhp
14 Mar 2003 — 6:34pm
BTW, can you spot the missing trap?
(Assuming a threshold of 90 degrees.)
hhp
14 Mar 2003 — 11:50pm
What, where?
hhp
15 Mar 2003 — 12:17am
I noticed the missing traps (2) on the waist
of the ampersand (&), as well as potentially
on the ear of the lc "g".
15 Mar 2003 — 9:25am
Stephen, yes.
--
If you trap the ear of the "g" (which can be seen as minimally above 90 degrees), then some others open up, like in the UC "Q".
hhp
15 Mar 2003 — 9:44am
yeah, I think it's very interesting too.
I've received that a while ago from a friend
while I was collecting information about
tv/video specific type design projects.
I've sent the original *huge* file (about 500kb)
so you could dig on it a little more.
http://www.designaz.com.br/type/cbsbig.jpg
I've also upload another page I've got,
comparing News Gothic Bold with CBS's font.
http://www.designaz.com.br/type/cbsbig2.jpg
Anyway, I couldn't find ANYTHING about it on
the net... If Hrant is right (Visible Language),
that'd be the most precise information I've
found so far.
hC
14 Mar 2003 — 10:33pm
...other than the one I mentioned elsewhere?
15 Mar 2003 — 12:06am
Oops. Meant to post this to Typo-L, but it went to Hugo's mail...
Wow, never seen this before. Looks like they took a slightly
condensed Helvetica and subjected it to some primitive
form of ink/light trapping with the same trap shape used
on any problem area, no matter the angle. Odd. Looks like
they ran out of steam and forgot to finish the ampersand.