New to Typophile? Accounts are free, and easy to set up.
Here's my latest project for myself. I saw Benton's Sterling and loved it and wanted to do a custom digitization, tweaking some things that I didn't like so much. So far all I have are the Capitals. In digitizing, I wated to try my hand at that fascinating faceting stuff. Eventually I'd like to expand this to a range of weights and optical sizes, but it's kind of slow going thus far. Anyhow, have a look. Let me know what you think so far.

| Attachment | Size |
|---|---|
| Howard.pdf | 18.42 KB |
28 Apr 2006 — 11:08am
anyone?
28 Apr 2006 — 11:51am
At first glance, it looks quite promising. I wonder if the faceting has been applied consistantly enough? The curve of the P is smoothe but the serifs are chunked.
The F, V, and T also seem a bit too wide. You might also look at the lower horizontal of the P, it seems to join too straight compared to top.
I will give it a longer look later.
ChrisL
28 Apr 2006 — 1:08pm
What is the 'faceting' for?
28 Apr 2006 — 10:37pm
Yeah, what is the faceting for? It seems odd to have a curve flow into a facet. Why not just all curves?
—K
29 Apr 2006 — 9:20am
It may be that this particular face is too modern for the faceting to work. Perhaps something more in the vein of Jenson or a hand-tooled look would lend itself to it?
ChrisL
29 Apr 2006 — 9:44am
Maybe it is an issue of the vertical stress opposing facets?
ChrisL
29 Apr 2006 — 10:01pm
I think it has promise too. I wonder if you should exaggerate the facets to begin with (text weight) and slowly diminish them (display) to better understand what effect they are having. Either way, if you are going to facet exaggerating them would be more fun.
1 May 2006 — 9:44am
Wasn't there a thread a while back "Chunky Type"?
ChrisL
1 May 2006 — 9:48am
Maybe this was It:
http://typophile.com/node/5303
ChrisL