<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://typophile.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Typophile - Bradley - Whaddya think? - Comments</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/6406</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Bradley - Whaddya think?&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Was their any advancement on</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/6406#comment-208093</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Was their any advancement on this? I always love the kettle one ads for their simplicity and the beautiful letters.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2007 05:49:37 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>j_polo9</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 208093 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>This Bradley was used for</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/6406#comment-159741</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;This Bradley was used for the american company Firestone.&lt;br /&gt;
And in the very early 1900 it was licensed to Bauersche Giesserei in Frankfurt am Main, Germany. They offered it under the name &amp;#8220;American Alt-Gotisch&amp;#8221;. There are only a very few fonts from out of Germany which where accepted by the german foundries - and if so, most of it came out of Europe, e.g. Lettergieterij Amsterdam, Netherlands. So the Bradley must have been a very fine designed and a very succesful font:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bleisetzer.de/index.php?target=shop/shop_details&amp;amp;artikel_id=481&amp;amp;b=0004&amp;amp;pic=a&quot; title=&quot;http://www.bleisetzer.de/index.php?target=shop/shop_details&amp;amp;artikel_id=481&amp;amp;b=0004&amp;amp;pic=a&quot;&gt;http://www.bleisetzer.de/index.php?target=shop/shop_details&amp;amp;artikel_id=4...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Georg&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a class=&quot;link&quot;&gt;Preußisches Bleisatz-Magazin&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 09:03:19 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Bleisetzer</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 159741 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title></title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/6406#comment-45164</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;A couple of files to share... First, a &lt;a href=&quot;http://mickeyavenue.com/fonts/bradley/Bradley-specimen.png&quot;&gt;high-resolution scan&lt;/a&gt; &amp;#40;1.4MB&amp;#41; from the Solotype book. Second, a &lt;a href=&quot;http://mickeyavenue.com/fonts/bradley/Bradley.zip&quot;&gt;zip file&lt;/a&gt; that contains my digitization in Type 1 and TrueType formats, with an accompanying text file.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed,  2 Mar 2005 08:23:40 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>gargoyle</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 45164 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title></title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/6406#comment-45163</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Looking inside the Flash file on the Ketel website reveals the font as &amp;#34;KetelOne&amp;#34; -- suggesting a custom job. It would still appear to be derived from Bradley.  &lt;BR&gt; &lt;BR&gt;There&amp;#39;s a blurb about Bradley in the book &amp;#34;American Type Design &amp;amp; Designers,&amp;#34; which credits the typeface to Joseph Phinney, based on lettering by Henry William Bradley. &lt;BR&gt; &lt;BR&gt;Finally, the reason I happened to have that scan of Bradley in the first place was because I had been intending to turn it into a font myself. I got as far as digitizing the letters in the sample, at which point I must have lost interest. I&amp;#39;m happy to provide the unfinished work to anyone who wants to make use of it.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2005 17:22:04 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>gargoyle</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 45163 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title></title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/6406#comment-45162</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;i took a look at a Ketel One ad again recently and although the font they use is very similar to Bradley, it isn&amp;#39;t Bradley! &amp;#40;at least not this Bradley as posted above&amp;#41; It&amp;#39;s a bit more refined and a tad easier on the eyes.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2005 20:42:19 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>pablohoney77</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 45162 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title></title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/6406#comment-45161</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;a few names.... &lt;BR&gt;Kettilica &lt;BR&gt;kettalica &lt;BR&gt;kettlika &lt;BR&gt;black kettle&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Sun, 12 Dec 2004 01:35:03 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>designalchemy</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 45161 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title></title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/6406#comment-45160</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I have been searching for that font forever...I know someone knows the name???  Anyone care to share?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Sat, 11 Dec 2004 19:01:44 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>laundry_group_inc</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 45160 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title></title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/6406#comment-45159</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;This sort of thing was so the range in ca. 1900 &amp;#34;Mitteleuropa&amp;#34;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2004 07:45:48 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>dan_reynolds</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 45159 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title></title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/6406#comment-45158</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;i was looking at this one again last night and i think i figgered out what Hermann was doing.... maybe... &lt;BR&gt;He was not mixing blackletter and modern, he was pulling from blackletter and Lombardic cap forms. I don&amp;#39;t think the two mix very well. So maybe i&amp;#39;ll do two versions &amp;#40;if i actually do any at all&amp;#41; one more blackletter and one more lombardic. There are actually several old faces that look a lot like this one, i wonder if this style wasn&amp;#39;t actually in vogue at one time. imagine that!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2004 07:36:22 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>pablohoney77</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 45158 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title></title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/6406#comment-45157</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;David Bowie said, &amp;#34;It isn&amp;#39;t about who does it first, but about who does it second.&amp;#34; I&amp;#39;d go for a redesign of this classic. The world needs more Art Nouveau fonts. &lt;BR&gt; &lt;BR&gt;I&amp;#39;d change the original design a little bit&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2004 04:22:56 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>dan_reynolds</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 45157 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title></title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/6406#comment-45156</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I lust for Art Nouveau. An intelligent revival of it would be the perfect antidote to all this Modernist child&amp;#39;s play. &lt;BR&gt; &lt;BR&gt;hhp&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2004 10:49:34 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>hrant</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 45156 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title></title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/6406#comment-45155</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;This sample is from the Dover Blackletter and Gothic fonts book. And I believe you&amp;#39;re right about it being digitized. &lt;BR&gt;So I hafta dig around to see if i can have someone send me more scans on this one for alternates? I think there are a couple fonts similar to this one in the same Dover book that I&amp;#39;ve got. I&amp;#39;ll probably look at those for alternate lettershapes for the ones i&amp;#39;m not particularly fond of. But am i right? do the characters i mentioned seem out of place? Hrant you&amp;#39;re ablsolutely right about Ketel One. I first saw this font in their advertising at first i thought it was Honda, but then i took another look. Anyway... now i&amp;#39;m rambling.... i&amp;#39;ll shut up now. ;^&amp;#41; &lt;BR&gt; &lt;BR&gt;oh and i just love art nouveau, victorian and deco lettering. that stuff really gets me goin!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2004 10:29:48 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>pablohoney77</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 45155 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title></title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/6406#comment-45154</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I think Dan X. Solo digitized this for one of his Dover font CD-ROMs. Aside from the inclusion of some particularly gorgeous designs unavailable elsewhere &amp;#40;Durer Gothic, King&amp;#39;s Cross, Church Text&amp;#41; I remember his versions being rather hastily digitized. I haven&amp;#39;t bought any of his newer work, so it may have improved, but there were all kinds of stroke weight inconsistencies that made the 24-fonts-for-$15 approach fall short. &lt;BR&gt; &lt;BR&gt;And I&amp;#39;ve developed a soft spot for Art Nouveau stuff, especially the earlier, more Teutonic &amp;amp; William Morris-sey lettering. So if you&amp;#39;re going to revive and refine this one, I salute you. Just be sure to dig around and find some of the original alternates, if they exist.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2004 09:33:26 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>johnbutler</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 45154 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title></title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/6406#comment-45153</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;If it matters&amp;#42;, there&amp;#39;s a Dutch vodka called Ketel One that uses this font. &lt;BR&gt; &lt;BR&gt;&amp;#42; Maybe in finding a new name for the &amp;#34;adaptation&amp;#34;. &lt;BR&gt; &lt;BR&gt;hhp&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2004 09:18:20 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>hrant</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 45153 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Bradley - Whaddya think?</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/6406</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;First off, lemme start with a disclaimer. This font is not mine, I did not create it. Just so you know from the outset. &lt;BR&gt; &lt;BR&gt;That said, I&amp;#39;ve been thinking I&amp;#39;d like to digitize this one or at least use it as basis for something else. The reason I wouldn&amp;#39;t do a straightforward digitization is that this face seems a bit too quirky still, perhaps the original auther would have benefited from a critique board like this. &amp;#40;I think this is another of Hermann Ihlenburg&amp;#39;s faces, I seem to have a thing for his work&amp;#41; &lt;BR&gt; &lt;BR&gt;Anyhow the biggest problem, as i see it, and what bothers me most is that the capitals C, D, G, E, O, Q, and maybe even P don&amp;#39;t really seem to fit &amp;#40;too round&amp;#41; and then the 8 gives me troubles too &amp;#40;too square&amp;#41;. I mean maybe Hermann was trying to mix blackletter with the modern style, but i don&amp;#39;t think they meshed too well in this example. &lt;BR&gt; &lt;BR&gt;So i guess my basic question is, if you could change anything about the following face, what would it be and why? &lt;BR&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.typophile.com/forums/messages/29/47748.gif&quot; alt=&quot;sample&quot;&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://typophile.com/node/6406#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://typophile.com/taxonomy/term/21">Blackletter / Uncial</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2004 08:50:21 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>pablohoney77</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">6406 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
