http://typophile.com/node/6178 Comments for "Long s+s vs. long s+z" en http://typophile.com/node/6178#comment-43421 <p>very informative article, ingo, thnx.</p> Fri, 20 Aug 2004 08:49:34 -0700 pablohoney77 comment 43421 at http://typophile.com http://typophile.com/node/6178#comment-43420 <p><a href="http://www.itcfonts.com/ulc/article.asp?nCo=AFMT&amp;sec=ulc&amp;issue=29.1.1&amp;art=letterseries-s" target="_blank">http://www.itcfonts.com/ulc/article.asp?nCo=AFMT&amp;sec=ulc&amp;issue=29.1.1&amp;art=letterseries-s</a> <BR> <BR>Ale</p> Fri, 20 Aug 2004 06:03:38 -0700 as8 comment 43420 at http://typophile.com http://typophile.com/node/6178#comment-43419 <p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%DF" target="_blank">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%DF</a> &#40;english&#41; <BR><a href="http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C3%9F" target="_blank">http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C3%9F</a> &#40;german&#41; <BR> <BR>[preusss]</p> Fri, 20 Aug 2004 05:49:21 -0700 mojuba comment 43419 at http://typophile.com http://typophile.com/node/6178 <p>Do these combos both represent the same glyph? i&#8217;m confused. could someone straighten me out?</p> http://typophile.com/node/6178#comments Design Thu, 19 Aug 2004 14:22:27 -0700 pablohoney77 6178 at http://typophile.com