<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://typophile.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Typophile - Font Licensing for Enterprise Software - Comments</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/45289</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Font Licensing for Enterprise Software&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Thread closed. Please join</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/45289#comment-279097</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Thread closed. Please join the conversation here: &lt;a href=&quot;http://typophile.com/node/45428&quot; title=&quot;http://typophile.com/node/45428&quot;&gt;http://typophile.com/node/45428&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 12:52:01 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Miss Tiffany</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 279097 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Thanks for the feedback so</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/45289#comment-278204</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the feedback so far, I suppose I should have posted this in the &amp;#8220;Release&amp;#8221; forum. Oh well.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 13:08:08 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Werkplace</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 278204 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>We do a lot of this sort of</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/45289#comment-278191</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;We do a lot of this sort of licensing as well.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;James&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 11:17:09 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>terminaldesign</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 278191 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>1) me!
2) Educating font</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/45289#comment-278182</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;1) me!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2) Educating font vendors as to how these technologies work can be painful, especially when the font vendor primarily supplies fonts to graphic designers. Add to this the technical challenges around character sets, OpenType and hinting and the field narrows. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So my advice (and people will criticize me for this) is to talk to vendors who understand the technology - so that would be Ascender, Monotype, Font Bureau, maybe Bitstream &amp;amp; H&amp;amp;FJ.   &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Second piece of advice would be to go custom - own the font/s outright (not necessarily exclusively) and you can avoid future licensing issues as technology and your plans change.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 10:42:24 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>sii</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 278182 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Font Licensing for Enterprise Software</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/45289</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I have been working as an IxD on enterprise level software for one of the largest IT companies in the world and am finally going to force a design decision through all our software and need some feedback from the experts.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Our software is mostly of the legacy desktop variety, with a few web and mobile applications. We are working on a strategy for combining all our UI&amp;#8217;s into a common technology, but have yet to make a firm decision (Java, WPF, or AIR, I am familiar with all). All of our technology is moving towards RIA&amp;#8217;s. But I may be working with all the UI technologies under the sun for the foreseeable future.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Up until now, we have avoided this issue by using system fonts. All users are on XP or Vista, so until I came on board, all our apps were using MS Sans and MS Serif, for the most part. System fonts. I want to use better screen fonts that are non-system. I am not talking display graphics here, I am talking about embedded app fonts.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;My old boss, Stefan Kjartansson is a serious typographer, and he instilled in me a serious respect for font licensing, so I want some serious answers here.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;With Flash and Silverlight (and Proce55ing), you have the ability to download font outlines remotely, and then remove them after the user exits the application. Fine for the free and open web, and emergent free, open source productivity tools in AIR etc.(37 signals manages to make money somehow) But it doesn&amp;#8217;t work with propritory RIA&amp;#8217;s where the primary modality is offline use. And actually, I have a big issue with the enabling web technology that allows designers to skirt font licensing, but that&amp;#8217;s another topic.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I know some guys I worked with at TATA that have been doing Flash e-learning apps for the last 8 years or so just never implement designs with non-system fonts because they already went through a licensing process and couldn&amp;#8217;t work out a deal, supposedly. The fonts have to be part of the end user install. I just don&amp;#8217;t take that at face value.  Since we also have SOA apps, we no longer have engineers going on site to install our software. Users can download and install apps based on their licensing agreement with our company.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So our company has hundreds of licensing models that are of the 100 page TPS report style. I am not sure how to even put a proposal together for a font house as I am going to have to get our lawyers involved due to the complexity.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So:&lt;br /&gt;
1) Has anyone successfully licensed and implemented a non-system font into enterprise software (multi-lingual) with WPF, AIR, Nimbus? I have done it in web and chat apps, want to get feedback from enterprise folks.&lt;br /&gt;
2) What were your challenges? What worked for you? How did you approach the font houses?&lt;br /&gt;
3) If any font house reps come on here, what is your stance on all of this? Am I just way off on this?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And Sorry for the long post! I just didn&amp;#8217;t see anything in the forumns on this.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://typophile.com/node/45289#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://typophile.com/taxonomy/term/4">General Discussions</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 09:04:04 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Werkplace</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">45289 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
