Typophile - Logotype for fashion label - Comments

The second one you did is

Gregers™ — Thu, 24 Apr 2008 01:34:32 -0700

The second one you did is the one I like best.

Hey Russ
I really do like your way as well, I am thinking now of something between yours and Eileens.

Also A big thanks to

Gregers™ — Thu, 24 Apr 2008 01:30:48 -0700

Also A big thanks to everyone who have picked up on this thread.
I am really busy at the moment, but will try to keep you posted as development progress.
Should say that this is still not a live brief yet(kind of a pitch at this stage), however with your help i believe it might go live.
Cheers everyone

The way the underline is

Gregers™ — Thu, 24 Apr 2008 01:21:57 -0700

The way the underline is broken by the g bothers me.

Hei Eileen, This is very nice. I really like the way this is going. Nice solution.
Cheers.

sorry to butt in with

jdat — Wed, 23 Apr 2008 14:13:23 -0700

sorry to butt in with questions but fashion label is very vague.

Could you give us anymore details about it?

High street, female/male, street, plain etc ...

First I would like to say

kidcranium — Wed, 23 Apr 2008 05:11:45 -0700

First I would like to say the development of this logo on the thread is very interesting.

The only concern is how this will look on a reduced on a fabric label, will it be too thin?

That is nice. I still think

Miss Tiffany — Tue, 22 Apr 2008 22:03:26 -0700

That is nice. I still think the underline should be swashy. But, don’t you feel that now you’ve added weight the bottom bowl of the g? You’ve basically filled it with white. Or am I thinking too much?

brilliant work Russ just the

Ratbaggy — Tue, 22 Apr 2008 19:28:56 -0700

brilliant work Russ

just the rg thing nowme thinks

—————
Paul Ducco
Graphic Design Melbourne

Very nice, Russ, I really

EileenB — Tue, 22 Apr 2008 18:09:05 -0700

Very nice, Russ, I really like your improvements! It has a much more cohesive feel.

The second one you did is

russ_mcmullin — Tue, 22 Apr 2008 17:42:36 -0700

The second one you did is the one I like best. The only thing that bugs me is the shape of the scroll underneath. I started wondering if the scroll itself could be the underline and did some experimenting:

But I think have the

Miss Tiffany — Tue, 22 Apr 2008 12:51:24 -0700

But I think have the underline intersect with the g breaks the shape.

I was going to comment along

aluminum — Tue, 22 Apr 2008 12:45:01 -0700

I was going to comment along the lines of Eileen. Right now the bottom of the B and g are too close. There needs to be more of a difference (ala Eileen’s suggestion)

I like where this is going.

Curiousity — Tue, 22 Apr 2008 11:49:06 -0700

I like where this is going. Keep it up!

The way the underline is

EileenB — Tue, 22 Apr 2008 11:25:37 -0700

The way the underline is broken by the g bothers me. This is a quick and (very) dirty example, but maybe the idea is worth exploring?

I liked the underline as you

Miss Tiffany — Tue, 22 Apr 2008 10:26:30 -0700

I liked the underline as you had it to begin. The swash was a nice way to finish the underline and balance the B.

Thanks a lot everyone.

Gregers™ — Tue, 22 Apr 2008 00:37:14 -0700

Thanks a lot everyone. :-)
Yes Miss Tiffany, it is a logotype. Do you reckon it would be better to drop the underline??

Logotype for fashion label

Gregers™ — Mon, 21 Apr 2008 05:18:31 -0700

I would appreciate some critique on this logotype. Especially on the kerning, i know its not perfect, but kerning script fonts like this can be a bit tricky. The face is Emily, and it was going to be used for a female fashion label.
Cheers