<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://typophile.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Typophile - sabon next - Comments</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/44178</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;sabon next&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>That’s why I haven’t</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/44178#comment-272343</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;That&amp;#8217;s why I haven&amp;#8217;t bothered...what is it, $90 per font?! We had a mention of it before here, and I believe one response was that it didn&amp;#8217;t match up that well, that the extra weights were gilding the lily, plus the price factor...I wouldn&amp;#8217;t mind ONE more weight to Sabon just for now and then, but not at that price. But I myself saw no particular problem with how it looked or matched the older family, just the price.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 05:58:46 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>mondoB</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 272343 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>sabon next</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/44178</link>
 <description>Can I ask what folks think of this face? Compared to Sabon. And how very expensive it is!

John </description>
 <comments>http://typophile.com/node/44178#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://typophile.com/taxonomy/term/54">Blog</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 05:34:01 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>johnland</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">44178 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
