<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://typophile.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Typophile - Unicode 5: no Ruble yet - Comments</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/43940</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Unicode 5: no Ruble yet&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>As far as I know, the new</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/43940#comment-271087</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;As far as I know, the new Ruble sign is basically just a local initiative of two private studios (ArtLebedev and Paratype) and is rather unlikely to become an official symbol. Reserving a place in Unicode seems a bit hasty.&lt;br /&gt;
_____________________________________________&lt;br /&gt;
Personal Art and Design Portal of Ivan Gulkov&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ivangdesign.com&quot; title=&quot;www.ivangdesign.com&quot;&gt;www.ivangdesign.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon,  7 Apr 2008 11:55:32 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>oprion</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 271087 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>At least there are some</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/43940#comment-270910</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;At least there are some codepoints left in the currency symbols page. One could put the Ruble mark in the next available one and correct it later if it gets assigned elsewhere or if the official design changes from what appears to be the leading candidate.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Sun,  6 Apr 2008 14:40:27 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>cuttlefish</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 270910 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>No, it’s already a virtual</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/43940#comment-270909</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;No, it’s already a virtual character:&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.paratype.ru/cinfo/news.asp?NewsId=78&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;and in English? :^P&lt;br /&gt;
seeing that no one (not least of all the Russian Central Bank) actually uses this symbol, i&amp;#8217;ll give an answer to my own question. it&amp;#8217;s too early to encode a ruble symbol which has no currency. (sorry for the pun)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Sun,  6 Apr 2008 14:33:18 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>paul d hunt</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 270909 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The euro already has a</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/43940#comment-270906</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The euro already has a codepoint. If they just wait a bit, they can have the U.S. dollar codepoint ;-) &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;#8212; or not, I guess we may need it for historical purposes, as a placeholder for wisea$$, etc. . . .&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Sun,  6 Apr 2008 14:10:33 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>charles_e</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 270906 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>I believe the Sputnik</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/43940#comment-270902</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I believe the Sputnik codepoint is the ideal place for a hack encoded symbol - Oops Apple already took it for the euro. ;-)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Sun,  6 Apr 2008 14:00:09 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>sii</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 270902 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Unicode mailing list from</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/43940#comment-270901</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Unicode mailing list from last month...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.unicode.org/mail-arch/unicode-ml/y2008-m03/index.html&quot; title=&quot;http://www.unicode.org/mail-arch/unicode-ml/y2008-m03/index.html&quot;&gt;http://www.unicode.org/mail-arch/unicode-ml/y2008-m03/index.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Sun,  6 Apr 2008 13:58:48 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>sii</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 270901 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>No, it’s already a virtual</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/43940#comment-270892</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;No, it&amp;#8217;s already a virtual character:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.paratype.ru/cinfo/news.asp?NewsId=78&quot; title=&quot;http://www.paratype.ru/cinfo/news.asp?NewsId=78&quot;&gt;http://www.paratype.ru/cinfo/news.asp?NewsId=78&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Sun,  6 Apr 2008 13:15:25 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Nick Shinn</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 270892 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>wouldn’t you think that</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/43940#comment-270887</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;wouldn&amp;#8217;t you think that was jumping the gun a bit?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Sun,  6 Apr 2008 12:41:09 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>paul d hunt</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 270887 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Unicode 5: no Ruble yet</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/43940</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The Ruble symbol design presently being promoted by several parties in the design trade hasn&amp;#8217;t yet passed muster with Unicode, neither having been accepted by an official institution, nor having become demonstrably widespread in vernacular usage (aszszelp).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Could a code number have been assigned, even if there is not yet an officially sanctioned glyph form?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://typophile.com/node/43940#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://typophile.com/taxonomy/term/4">General Discussions</category>
 <pubDate>Sun,  6 Apr 2008 12:26:47 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Nick Shinn</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">43940 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
