<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://typophile.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Typophile - rough script - Comments</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/42095</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;rough script&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>I think Mike’s suggestion</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/42095#comment-259111</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I think Mike&amp;#8217;s suggestion of Cataneo is closer.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; - Lex&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 09:02:15 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Lex Kominek</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 259111 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Thanks a lot for your</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/42095#comment-259110</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks a lot for your suggestions.  It looks like I will be using ITC Zapf Chancery Bold and manually leaning it about ten degrees.  It&amp;#8217;s not a perfect match, but it&amp;#8217;s alot closer than where I started.  If the client has a problem with it, I guess we&amp;#8217;ll find something new together.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks again for your time and effort.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 08:57:49 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>jrgott</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 259110 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>For some more specific</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/42095#comment-259002</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;For some more specific &amp;#8217;chancery&amp;#8217; suggestions, you could look at Zapf Chancery Italic (the &amp;#8217;k&amp;#8217; is not the same in the regular version), or Bitstream Cataneo. All the other Chancery-ish styles I have found have a looped &amp;#8217;k&amp;#8217;. (Corsiva, Poetica, Lucida Calligraphy and Le Griffe, to mention four.)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;- Mike Yanega&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 20:14:30 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>bowfinpw</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 259002 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>I’d second the chancery</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/42095#comment-258932</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#8217;d second the chancery guess.  the &amp;#8217;b&amp;#8217; and &amp;#8217;k&amp;#8217; certainly seem to point to Chancery - not my favorite font I have to add, as I was forced to use it for a series of pitta bread packagings - and it looks a bit shoddy (imho).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;JH&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 13:47:27 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>jazzhustler</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 258932 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>It seems to be some kind of</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/42095#comment-258868</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;It seems to be some kind of chancery...&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 10:31:37 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>microspective</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 258868 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>rough script</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/42095</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I apologize for this rough graphic but you know the gig.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Can anyone identify this script through the haze of multiple faxing?&lt;div class=&quot;imageWrap&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;/files/dick&#039;s lab_5735.jpg&quot; /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://typophile.com/node/42095#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://typophile.com/taxonomy/term/29">Type ID Board</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 10:19:17 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>jrgott</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">42095 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
