<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://typophile.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Typophile - Clarendon variant? - Comments</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/41882</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Clarendon variant?&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>I always wanted a larger</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/41882#comment-257657</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I always wanted a larger family of just the fill. Love that typeface!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Sat,  9 Feb 2008 17:18:01 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>DanGayle</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 257657 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>I feel like I’m meant to</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/41882#comment-257602</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I feel like I&amp;#8217;m meant to apologize for not noticing it earlier. My only excuse is that it&amp;#8217;s now all over the metro with that accounting firm campaign, so it bubbled up through my subconscious on a few long trips on the Orange Line.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Sat,  9 Feb 2008 12:59:45 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>elzadra</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 257602 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>One of the reasons it’s</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/41882#comment-257579</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;One of the reasons it&amp;#8217;s uneven is that it&amp;#8217;s meant to be the method for coloring the fill on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fontshop.com/fonts/singles/monotype/rosewood_std_ot/&quot;&gt;Rosewood&lt;/a&gt;. Fascinating how popular it&amp;#8217;s become. I guess it shows that there&amp;#8217;s a demand for imperfect wood stuff.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Sat,  9 Feb 2008 11:54:33 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Stephen Coles</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 257579 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Kate, this kind of typeface</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/41882#comment-257569</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Kate, this kind of typeface is used very often like Mike said, even in Montreal where you took that picture. It appeared just after the &amp;#8220;circus types&amp;#8221; like Zebrawood and Rosewood Regular back in 2001-2002.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Sat,  9 Feb 2008 11:23:32 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Alexandre Bélanger</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 257569 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>One could argue about</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/41882#comment-257565</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;One could argue about whether it’s fashion or rather availability, as Rosewood comes bundled with Adobe software.&lt;br /&gt;
It really &lt;em&gt;is&lt;/em&gt; a nice typeface, charmingly uneven.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Sat,  9 Feb 2008 11:05:26 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Florian Hardwig</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 257565 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Very true, Kate ... and you</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/41882#comment-257560</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Very true, Kate ... and you are certainly welcome.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Sat,  9 Feb 2008 10:20:16 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Mike F</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 257560 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Fashions vary depending</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/41882#comment-257556</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Fashions vary depending where you live. Thanks.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Sat,  9 Feb 2008 10:08:28 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>elzadra</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 257556 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Rosewood Fill. It’s not</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/41882#comment-257553</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.myfonts.com/fonts/linotype/rosewood/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Rosewood Fill&lt;/a&gt;. It&amp;#8217;s not just lately ... it has been rather popular for two or three years now.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Sat,  9 Feb 2008 09:58:39 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Mike F</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 257553 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Clarendon variant?</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/41882</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;This Clarendon variant is all over the place lately, but I can&amp;#8217;t pin it down. Please excuse metro phone-cam type shot.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;imageWrap&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;/files/indispensable_3643.jpg&quot; /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://typophile.com/node/41882#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://typophile.com/taxonomy/term/29">Type ID Board</category>
 <pubDate>Sat,  9 Feb 2008 09:50:42 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>elzadra</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">41882 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
