<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://typophile.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Typophile - Logo Critique for a Carpenter&amp;#039;s Brand - Comments</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/41516</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Logo Critique for a Carpenter&#039;s Brand&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Thank you all for the great</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/41516#comment-255500</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Thank you all for the great critiques. It&amp;#8217;s really great to have such good, critical looks available. So that you all very much.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I am actually going to try sharper corners. I&amp;#8217;m not sure if I want them to be square, as part of the concept was that it was to look like it was an old-school wood routed sign, but maybe a little less rounded. Thanks!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Kristi, to answer your question: all told, this logo probably took about 10 hours of work, not including visual research and planning. And unfortunately, for this one, I did not start by sketching, although I went back to it a couple times. Part of my process is to get jobs, really dig into researching them -visual and otherwise- then let them simmer for a while. In this case what took so long was that the company name is very, very vague and hard to work with, so I got trapped into thinking that I could make it whatever I wanted, which was not the case. When I went back and thought about the founder, the work and what the company actually did I realized the name was just that: a name; and that the actual look and direction for the design was better predicated by those other factors, and not on the name itself.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 15:49:15 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>cmcd</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 255500 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>This isn’t a comment on</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/41516#comment-255448</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;This isn&amp;#8217;t a comment on the type... which as been addressed ad-nauseum. First off, this is a very elegant looking design, and would look fabulous as a wood etched sign. Two things jumped out at me.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;First, the border is very nice, but it&amp;#8217;s also very heavy and compared to the weight of the text, seems almost too heavy. My eye is drawn to it almost immediately. This almost give the text inside a very trapped feeling to it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Second, is more of a nit-picky issue. The rounded corners of the border, though keeping with the soft look of the inner stroke, seems too soft. I think sharp corners would play against the softness of your detail better.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Those are my opinions, either way, you have a nice design going for this.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 12:21:25 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Asvetic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 255448 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>I think it’s great!  I see</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/41516#comment-255404</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I think it&amp;#8217;s great!  I see the &amp;#8220;S,&amp;#8221; too.  Since I&amp;#8217;ve been coming here for help, I&amp;#8217;d love to know how long it took you to do this and if you just tried it in Illustrator / Paint, etc. or if you drew it on paper first.  I love the ornamental touch to the lines.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 06:58:27 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Kristi</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 255404 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Thanks for the feedback</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/41516#comment-255217</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the feedback guys.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And you&amp;#8217;re right Darrel, you have seen it before. A long, long time ago. I think it progressed really well though with some new direction.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#8217;ll look at modifying the &amp;#8217;S&amp;#8217;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks very much!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 12:00:17 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>cmcd</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 255217 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Exactly what I thought.
Make</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/41516#comment-255179</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Exactly what I thought.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Make the fatter stroke on the &amp;#8217;S&amp;#8217; narrower to optically match the rest. I think the &amp;#8217;C&amp;#8217; is probably OK.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 09:19:45 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>jayyy</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 255179 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>I’ve seen this</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/41516#comment-255147</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#8217;ve seen this elsewhere...this appears to be a nice progression to this point. I agree, silly name, but you&amp;#8217;ve done well with what you have to work with.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It literally says &amp;#8217;ceilings&amp;#8217; but the look and feel certainly give a nice craftsmanship feel to acknowledge the greater service offerings.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Only major thing is that the &amp;#8217;S&amp;#8217; in ceilings appears optically larger, even though I&amp;#8217;m sure it&amp;#8217;s not. You might want to fudge the size of that a bit to bring it in balance.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 08:09:14 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>aluminum</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 255147 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Logo Critique for a Carpenter&#039;s Brand</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/41516</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Hello, I was hoping I could get some new eyes on this logo. I think it is pretty close to being done, but any critiques would be very welcome. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A little background on the company:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1) First off, I did not choose the name of the company. It still urks me.&lt;br /&gt;
2) The company specializes in ceilings of all sorts, but also does woodwork (such as carpentry, cabinetry, and other wood-related practices)&lt;br /&gt;
3) The guy has been doing this stuff since about 1970 and is very traditional in his approaches.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I obviously tried to encompass these traits and really work to convey a traditional, old-style, blue-collar feel.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Again, please let me know what you think, be it general or specific.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks very much for looking!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://typophile.com/node/41516#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://typophile.com/taxonomy/term/23">Logos / Corporate ID Design</category>
 <enclosure url="http://typophile.com/files/Ceiling-Logo.png" length="41098" type="image/png" />
 <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 20:31:49 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>cmcd</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">41516 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
