<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://typophile.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Typophile - Arcane Type Terminology - Comments</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/40356</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Arcane Type Terminology&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>@eliason: Some of</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/40356#comment-249882</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;@eliason: &lt;em&gt;Some of Wikipedia’s listed synonyms for the slash are new to me: “oblique, diagonal, whack, separatrix, virgule, scratch comma, slant, or forward slash.” Have any of you called it a whack, a separatrix, or a scratch comma before?&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;@aluminium: &lt;em&gt;Well, isn’t that still typography? ...Perhaps there’s a need for articles to have a section on ’contemporary variations’ or the like.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I question whether what programmers do can be considered, or defined, as typography. Writing code is a form of typesetting in the sense that letters are set, but is it really typesetting or typography? I submit that it is not, because the goal of programming is not to set type in an aesthetically pleasing and coherent manner, but to write code to control the functions of a computer. Two different activites or professions are equated and conflated.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The definition of typography is being broadened to include things which are not typographic, but linguistic or semantic. Certain tasks in programming are being conflated with typography tasks. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So if the inclusionist philosophy wins in this absurd encyclopedestrianization of everything, and terms used by programmers must be included in typography articles because they are &amp;#8220;contemporary vernacular&amp;#8221;, the sensible thing to do is make it clear what came from where, distinguish between typography and &amp;#8220;codesetting&amp;#8221;. That would be a useful word for it. When composing you are typesetting, when writing code you are codesetting.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;j a m e s&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Sat,  5 Jan 2008 12:15:01 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>James Arboghast</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 249882 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Aha, okay. Thanks for</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/40356#comment-249879</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Aha, okay. Thanks for clarifying!&lt;br /&gt;
Btw, for those who think ‘Zwiebelfische’ are limited to the old metal days: Try inserting a ďīăċŗĩťıč that isn’t included in Georgia …&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Sat,  5 Jan 2008 11:54:22 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Florian Hardwig</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 249879 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Zwiebelfisch [onion fish] is</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/40356#comment-249849</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Zwiebelfisch [onion fish] is a letter accidentally set in a different font (or a letter put in the wrong case)&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
No, a letter in the wrong case is just a Fisch (fish). A “verfischter Kasten” is a case full of wrong fonts. Sounds like a kosher sandwich, but was more often than not left to the apprentices (like me) to clean up. Which entailed setting &lt;em&gt;all&lt;/em&gt; the type from the case into the composing stick to sort good from bad. And then “dissing” it back, as we called that in London.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Fri,  4 Jan 2008 23:23:34 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>eriks</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 249849 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>German terms would be</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/40356#comment-249678</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;cite&gt;German terms would be great&lt;/cite&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Well, the most frequently quoted surely are ‘Hurenkind’ [child of a bitch] for ‘widow’ and ‘Schusterjunge’ [cobbler boy] for ‘orphan’ …&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A voluminous printed matter free of errors – without having made a single correction – is a ‘Jungfrau(enwunder)’ [‘virgin (miracle)’ – yes, printers &amp;amp; typesetters are/were predominantly male], ‘Leading’ is called ‘Durchschuss’ [‘shot right through’?], a ‘Zwiebelfisch’ [onion fish] is a letter accidentally set in a different font (or a letter put in the wrong case), and an upside-down metal letter (so that the cone’s bottom leaves its print)  is a ‘Fliegenkopf’ [fly’s head]. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There are a lot more; and yes, I’d like to learn about some more from Erik’s experienced vocabulary, too – especially if they aren’t included in &lt;a href=&quot;http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Druckersprache&quot;&gt;this Wikipedia list&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.flickr.com/photos/romibello/465006308/&quot;&gt;This map, the ‘Typographiae Imperii Accurata Tabula’&lt;/a&gt;, is packed with type and printing terms, a lot of them ‘arcane’, most of them in German.&lt;br /&gt;
Made by Linotype in 1967, found on Robert Michael’s Flickr pages.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Fri,  4 Jan 2008 09:41:33 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Florian Hardwig</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 249678 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>&gt; Exclamation points were</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/40356#comment-249660</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; Exclamation points were called “screamers”.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Place I worked at years back called them a &amp;#8220;bang&amp;#8221;.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Fri,  4 Jan 2008 08:22:41 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Don McCahill</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 249660 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>German terms would be great</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/40356#comment-249632</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;German terms would be great&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Fri,  4 Jan 2008 06:44:44 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ehague</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 249632 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Looking forward to hearing</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/40356#comment-249593</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Looking forward to hearing about the offensive and arcane printing terms!&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Do you want me to get started on German terms? For all these weird and wonderful terms in English there are those in all the other languages. I only had to learn them in two languages, and that was hard enough.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu,  3 Jan 2008 21:17:02 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>eriks</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 249593 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>[i]“Twip” and</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/40356#comment-249587</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;[i]“Twip” and “tittle” both strike me as particularly obscure. Got any others?[/i]&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Now I&amp;#8217;m just itchin&amp;#8217; for the chance to say &amp;#8220;that tittle needs to be nipped a twip&amp;#8221;.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu,  3 Jan 2008 20:52:22 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>popluhv</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 249587 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>OK. Here’s the possibly</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/40356#comment-249582</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;OK. Here&amp;#8217;s the possibly offensive one. Sometimes &amp;#8220;deadwood&amp;#8221; was set with sorts that were type high, but that had no image on them. They were rectangles that printed black. And they were very easy for proofreaders and comps to spot.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In many hot-metal shops, even unto the 1980s, the term for them was &amp;#8220;niggerhead.&amp;#8221; In fact, that is the only term I ever heard for them. &amp;amp; I was pretty startled.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;****************&lt;br /&gt;
Let me also clarify &amp;#8220;deadwood&amp;#8221;. That term is used not only for numerical placeholders. Any matter set to indicate where a compositor is to insert other sorts is known as &amp;#8220;deadwood.&amp;#8221; Or &amp;#8220;bogus.&amp;#8221; I worked at a Monotype shop where we had to insert Greek, Cyrillic, and Chinese by hand. Keyboard operators set deadwood to the approximately correct width and we comps would insert the non-Latin.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;****************&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#8220;Workups&amp;#8221; were pushed down with special awls known in the type and printing trades as &amp;#8220;bodkins.&amp;#8221; Or sometimes with a &amp;#8220;palm rule.&amp;#8221; I wish I still had a set of those.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That&amp;#8217;s it for tonight. Gotta go shovel snow.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;powers&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu,  3 Jan 2008 20:18:42 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>will powers</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 249582 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>&amp;emsp;IE7 at least renders</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/40356#comment-249542</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;emsp;IE7 at least renders em &amp;amp; en spaces correctly.&amp;ensp;IE6 can&amp;#8217;t get &lt;em&gt;anything&lt;/em&gt; right!&lt;br /&gt;
—Joel&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu,  3 Jan 2008 15:38:41 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>JCSalomon</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 249542 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>How the small caps above</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/40356#comment-249539</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;How the small caps above rendered on IE6.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;imageWrap&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;/files/smallcaphell_6254.jpg&quot; /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;-=®=-&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu,  3 Jan 2008 15:34:11 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>russellm</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 249539 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Oh...way to keep us hanging!</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/40356#comment-249486</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Oh...way to keep us hanging! Looking forward to hearing about the offensive and arcane printing terms!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu,  3 Jan 2008 12:01:04 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>aluminum</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 249486 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Exclamation points were</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/40356#comment-249394</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Exclamation points were called &amp;#8220;screamers&amp;#8221;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Question marks were called &amp;#8220;queries&amp;#8221;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thin strips of wood spacing are &amp;#8220;reglets&amp;#8221;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When spacing material rises in a forme being printed, black marks show between words or between lines. They are called &amp;#8220;workups&amp;#8221;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In books, several zeroes were often set to indicate a page number to be inserted later, after the whole book was paginated, as &amp;#8220;See page 000.&amp;#8221; These zeroes were called &amp;#8220;deadwood&amp;#8221; or &amp;#8220;bogus.&amp;#8221;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I can offer more, including one that some may find offensive. but I&amp;#8217;m just back at the desk after two weeks off work [and blessedly away from computers] and there are piles of stuff to tend to. So let me get back to this in a day or so.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;H N Y to you all.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;powers&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu,  3 Jan 2008 06:53:13 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>will powers</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 249394 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Fridays, we would “Throw</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/40356#comment-248995</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Fridays, we would &amp;#8220;Throw in&amp;#8221; at the letterpress shop. We would loosen the quoins, re-stock the furniture and &amp;#8220;throw in&amp;#8221; or dump the type out and put it all back in the California Job Cases.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I swept the floors while the journeymen differentiated between d&amp;#8217;s, p&amp;#8217;s, b&amp;#8217;s and q&amp;#8217;s.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 17:02:27 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>textwrap</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 248995 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Each browser uses its own</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/40356#comment-248991</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Each browser uses its own nonstandard methods of finding characters that aren’t present in the current font. Hence the different behaviors even on the same operating system with the same fonts.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 14:52:43 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>jcrippen</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 248991 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Arcane Type Terminology</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/40356</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;#8220;Twip&amp;#8221; and &amp;#8220;tittle&amp;#8221; both strike me as particularly obscure. Got any others?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://typophile.com/node/40356#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://typophile.com/taxonomy/term/4">General Discussions</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2007 12:21:37 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ehague</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">40356 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
