<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://typophile.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Typophile - Helvetica Neue == Neue Helvetica? - Comments</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/35810</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Helvetica Neue == Neue Helvetica?&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>&gt;Is Helvetica Neue, as sold</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/35810#comment-218198</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt;Is Helvetica Neue, as sold by Adobe, the same thing as Neue Helvetica, as sold by Linotype?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As far as I know, the answer here would be yes.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu,  9 Aug 2007 02:47:17 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>dan_reynolds</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 218198 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The best place to ask this</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/35810#comment-217751</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The best place to ask this is Linotype, as their internal documentation might be more complete than what&amp;#8217;s on their website.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue,  7 Aug 2007 11:21:30 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Stephen Coles</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 217751 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Neue Helvetica is the</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/35810#comment-217440</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Neue Helvetica is the correct name for the remake of the hodge podge version of Helvetica. Use the Linotype version for all reference material.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon,  6 Aug 2007 14:04:05 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Robert Trogman</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 217440 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Helvetica Neue == Neue Helvetica?</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/35810</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.adobe.com/type/browser/P/P_059.html&quot;&gt;Helvetica Neue&lt;/a&gt;, as sold by Adobe, the same thing as &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.linotype.com/88565/neuehelveticafamilyvaluepack-compilation.html&quot;&gt;Neue Helvetica&lt;/a&gt;, as sold by Linotype?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Adobe lists the designer of Helvetica Neue as &amp;#8220;Linotype Staff,&amp;#8221; while Linotype appears to sell some &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.linotype.com/112299/itcofficinabyadobefontfamilygroup-clan.html&quot;&gt;Adobe fonts&lt;/a&gt;. The PostScript versions of both fonts appear to use the same &amp;#8220;easy-to-use numbering system&amp;#8221; in the font names.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Curiously, the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.adobe.com/type/browser/P/P_1198.html&quot;&gt;Adobe OpenType&lt;/a&gt; version of Helvetica Neue doesn&amp;#8217;t seem to have numbers in the font names, while the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.linotype.com/88565/neuehelveticafamilyvaluepack-compilation.html&quot;&gt;Linotype OpenType&lt;/a&gt; version does.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#8217;m writing a style guide, and I&amp;#8217;m trying to figure out which of these fonts (if any) are interchangeable. Thanks for your help.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If you have any additional insights into differences between the two, or why this confusing situation exists, I&amp;#8217;d love to know.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;P.S. I originally posted this question on &lt;a href=&quot;http://ask.metafilter.com/68665/Helvetica-Neue-Neue-Helvetica&quot;&gt;Ask Metafilter&lt;/a&gt;, and was advised to ask again here.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://typophile.com/node/35810#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://typophile.com/taxonomy/term/4">General Discussions</category>
 <pubDate>Mon,  6 Aug 2007 13:59:03 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>designbot</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">35810 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
