Typophile - modular geometric decorative "GO" in GO Transit logo - Comments

Thanks to the moderator(s)

russellm — Mon, 19 Feb 2007 09:53:17 -0800

Thanks to the moderator(s) for editing my title to conform so perfectly to the more useful format described in the FAQs (Which I have now read). I Don’t think I could have been more vague with my originnal title if I tried.

as promised, (or threatened) I’ve posted my reconstruction of the font in the first post in the thread.

Thanks, everyone for all the

russellm — Sun, 18 Feb 2007 19:24:20 -0800

Thanks, everyone for all the help.

I used to keep all my old Lettraset catalogs - Then one day I cleaned up. Never again!!! :0)

Some of the fonts posted have given me clues as to how the other characters should be constructed.

Thanks again.

I will post what I have so far on Monday, in case anyone’s interested.

The O is rotated 90°, but

oldnick — Sun, 18 Feb 2007 18:01:42 -0800

The O is rotated 90°, but this is very close.

I found this in a solotype

edward maddison — Fri, 16 Feb 2007 10:31:51 -0800

I found this in a solotype catalogue, its still not quite right but perhaps a little closer:

I added The word Transit to

russellm — Fri, 16 Feb 2007 09:36:55 -0800

I added The word Transit to the attachments above. I had to redraw it. Essentially, it’s an alphabet made from the minimum number of most geometrically basic possible shapes that will fit into a perfect square. It’s easy to replicate, but I want to see how letters like Y, W, X, Z and numerals were handled within the rules the rest of the alphabet follow.

Stock is very close in some letters, but not quite a cigar...

All you need to do is rotate

Linda Cunningham — Fri, 16 Feb 2007 07:33:42 -0800

All you need to do is rotate the “O” 90 deg. on Stock and you’ve got it.

Thanks, Edward. yes, Goran -

russellm — Fri, 16 Feb 2007 07:11:52 -0800

Thanks, Edward.

yes, Goran - it’s just five easy shapes, but you’d be surprized how many ways there are for sign companies to screw it up. :o)

It is a typeface. The original logo included the word “TRANSIT” in the same style.

Are Stock close enough?

Marten Fischer — Fri, 16 Feb 2007 07:02:57 -0800

Are Stock close enough?

I don’t think its a

Goran Soderstrom — Fri, 16 Feb 2007 06:58:03 -0800

I don’t think its a typeface – it’s two circles, and a square that covers 1/4th of the first circle – and then three lines cutting the pieces ;-)

Or... three halfcircles, one 1/4th circle and a square.

i couldn’t get your image

edward maddison — Fri, 16 Feb 2007 06:54:59 -0800

i couldn’t get your image to work so posted another for reference. i have looked through some my letraset books from the 70’s but haven’t found it im afraid

Nice, but, that’s actually

russellm — Fri, 16 Feb 2007 06:49:52 -0800

Nice, but, that’s actually who I work for. I’m looking for the actual typeface - even just a name, a sample sheet, or other images with examples of it.

Thanks

http://www.rdharch.com/transp

edward maddison — Fri, 16 Feb 2007 06:37:56 -0800

http://www.rdharch.com/transportation_industrial/go_transit_union/go_tra...

Getting an error, check the

poms — Fri, 16 Feb 2007 06:22:43 -0800

Getting an error, check the hyperlink.

modular geometric decorative "GO" in GO Transit logo

russellm — Fri, 16 Feb 2007 06:12:14 -0800

I’m looking for the
(very ’60’s) typeface used in this logo. What I know about it is that it was availble in Lettraset in the late sixties and that it is extremely geometric. All the letters are basically made up of squares and arcs subdivided vertically and/or horizonatlly in the middle.

I remember seeing this typeface in an old Lettraset catalogue - which incidentally was exactly how the logo was created. GO Transit was started in 1967 by the government of Ontario (Government of Ontario Transit - get it? :) ) with a few used trains and a few stations. During the planning & start-up period the Ministry of Transportation’s art department “donated” cabinets full of old lettraset - probably all the stuff they had no intention of ever using. A secretary was given the task of coming up with a logo and... voila. Not bad for a company that obviously placed so little value in design at the time. :o).

any clues would be much appreciated.

Thanks

(link should be fixed - & I added an attached image)

(Edit, 02, 19. 07 - attached image - my attemt at reconstructing the font.)
Russ