<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://typophile.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Typophile - More FL class based Kerning - Comments</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/27424</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;More FL class based Kerning&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>And one</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/27424#comment-277199</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;And one more,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://typophile.com/node/45057&quot; title=&quot;http://typophile.com/node/45057&quot;&gt;http://typophile.com/node/45057&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(Can a moderator please correct the typo in the thread&amp;#8217;s title Kering -&amp;gt; Kerning. Thanks!)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed,  7 May 2008 13:08:21 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Miguel Sousa</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 277199 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Adding a few more references</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/27424#comment-277196</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Adding a few more references to threads related with the &lt;strong&gt;Start of new pair positioning subtable; some pairs may never be accessed&lt;/strong&gt; error,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a class=&quot;freelinking-external&quot; href=&quot;http://www.typophile.com/node/30567&quot;&gt;http://www.typophile.com/node/30567&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a class=&quot;freelinking-external&quot; href=&quot;http://www.typophile.com/node/37959&quot;&gt;http://www.typophile.com/node/37959&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a class=&quot;freelinking-external&quot; href=&quot;http://www.typophile.com/node/38773&quot;&gt;http://www.typophile.com/node/38773&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a class=&quot;freelinking-external&quot; href=&quot;http://www.typophile.com/node/39456&quot;&gt;http://www.typophile.com/node/39456&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed,  7 May 2008 12:46:41 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Miguel Sousa</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 277196 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>&gt; Isn’t FL 4.6 a free</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/27424#comment-151893</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; Isn’t FL 4.6 a free upgrade?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Even if it was, it is not anymore. We’re not issuing any free updates for FontLab 4.5 or 4.6 anymore. Even though they did help in some matters, these versions of the software are still behind the current font format needs. Especially if you’re making OpenType fonts, I’d definitely consider upgrading to FontLab Studio 5, since previous versions of FontLab simply did not completely fulfill the &amp;#8220;best practice&amp;#8221; recommendations for OpenType fonts. Unfortunately, the reality of OpenType for the last 2-3 years has been that the OpenType specification has been frozen and a lot of un- or underdocumented fixes and recommendations were issued by Adobe and Microsoft. FontLab Studio 5 takes these into account. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Sat,  5 Aug 2006 12:50:58 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>twardoch</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 151893 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Darn it, wish they did</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/27424#comment-151762</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Darn it, wish they did :-)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ChrisL&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Fri,  4 Aug 2006 09:09:43 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>dezcom</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 151762 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>I think so. And FL Studio 5</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/27424#comment-151757</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I think so. And FL Studio 5 makes some things even easier (like assigning rightside/leftside flags for kern classes right in the classes panel).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;However, neither of them would free you of setting up kern classes correctly.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;:)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Karsten&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Fri,  4 Aug 2006 08:48:20 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>k.l.</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 151757 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Isn’t FL 4.6 a free</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/27424#comment-151737</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Isn&amp;#8217;t FL 4.6 a free upgrade?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ChrisL&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Fri,  4 Aug 2006 06:13:24 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>dezcom</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 151737 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Hello! I think all aspects</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/27424#comment-151733</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Hello! I think all aspects have been touched in other threads already. Spot Adam Twardoch&amp;#8217;s description here:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://typophile.com/node/6373&quot;&gt;http://typophile.com/node/6373&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
But these also mention things to consider when using classes:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://typophile.com/node/19633&quot;&gt;http://typophile.com/node/19633&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://typophile.com/node/18452&quot;&gt;http://typophile.com/node/18452&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://typophile.com/node/16413&quot;&gt;http://typophile.com/node/16413&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
And a few more:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://typophile.com/node/27336&quot;&gt;http://typophile.com/node/27336&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://typophile.com/node/7156&quot;&gt;http://typophile.com/node/7156&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://typophile.com/node/20052&quot;&gt;http://typophile.com/node/20052&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Seems it&amp;#8217;s one of the favorite subjects.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;;-)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Fri,  4 Aug 2006 05:41:04 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>k.l.</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 151733 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>More FL class based Kerning</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/27424</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Hi all,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#8217;m using FL 4.5, and I&amp;#8217;m doing the kerning using classes to produce a opentype font. Everything is fine apart form this output I get when I compile the opentype features.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; Start of new pair positioning subtable; some pairs may never be accessed: [Y Yacute Ycircumflex Ydieresis] [agrave aacute acircumflex atilde adieresis aring amacron abreve] [WORK:Applications:FontLab 4.5:fontlab.fea 114]&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#8217;ve checked the classes to make sure there is no duplications, and the kerning for the key glyph. The kerning seems to be working fine, so I carn&amp;#8217;t work out what&amp;#8217;s causing this output.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;s.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://typophile.com/node/27424#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://typophile.com/taxonomy/term/6">Build</category>
 <pubDate>Thu,  3 Aug 2006 10:03:20 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>coop</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">27424 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
