<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://typophile.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Typophile - Zapfino prose? - Comments</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/18286</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Zapfino prose?&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Even though Zapfino contains</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/18286#comment-111074</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Even though Zapfino contains many flourish lines, it certainly is not quite suitable for long texts as it distracts the reader from the content. In my &amp;#8217;own&amp;#8217; opinion, try Poetica Chancery with variations or Snell Roundhand, Edwardian Script or even Shelley families as these are more readable. But it&amp;#8217;s solely up to your intentions and ideas.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;#8212;- pinky kinky winky &amp;#8212;-&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Sat,  4 Mar 2006 08:37:52 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>verdiinpink</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 111074 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Zapfino prose?</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/18286</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Hi all,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#8217;m using lines of prose in a design and wondered what people thought of Zapfino. I sometimes get the feeling it&amp;#8217;s can be hard to read. the point size is set at 23, what leading should it be subsequently?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;any other suggestions of typeface are very welcome.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://typophile.com/node/18286#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://typophile.com/taxonomy/term/5">Design</category>
 <pubDate>Thu,  2 Mar 2006 09:06:42 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>R27</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">18286 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
