<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://typophile.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Typophile - postscript and printing questions - Comments</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/14752</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;postscript and printing questions&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>I believe there is RIP</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/14752#comment-84647</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I believe there is RIP software which can assist you with this problem. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.adobe.com/support/techdocs/322680.html&quot;&gt;This&lt;/a&gt; article on Adobe.com might get you started.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2005 08:43:06 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Miss Tiffany</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 84647 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>postscript and printing questions</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/14752</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;When a Type1 font is sent to a non-postscript printer, say a home office laser printer, what happens? and is it really detrimental to the output? When a PDF containing embedded Type1 fonts and illustrator or freehand vector art is printed to a non-postscript printer, what happens? and is it really detrimental to the output?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Empirical evidence suggests that subtle curves come out jagged, is this the case? Is there a way to print a postscript document to a non-postscript printer without degrading the quality, or is there no qualitative difference to begin with?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://typophile.com/node/14752#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://typophile.com/taxonomy/term/6">Build</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2005 08:17:42 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>grod</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">14752 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
